MLSs Settle in Pocket Listing Lawsuit; NAR Remains a Defendant

Major MLSs, including CRMLS, Bright MLS, and MRED, settle in the Pocket Listing Lawsuit, which challenges NAR's Clear Cooperation policy. NAR remains a defendant in the case.
BAM BBQ 2026

If you're still treating AI like a search engine, this is for you. BAM BBQ is two and a half hours of real instruction on AI for real estate, from conversations to content to systems. It’s free, virtual, and loaded with plays you can run the same week. Save your spot →

Six smiling real estate agents stand against orange, black, and red panels with a bold headline about learning AI now and BAMx/realtor logos in the band at the bottom.
FREE VIRTUAL EVENT
BAM BBQ 2026

If you're still treating AI like a search engine, this is for you. BAM BBQ is two and a half hours of real instruction on AI for real estate, from conversations to content to systems. It’s free, virtual, and loaded with plays you can run the same week. Save your spot →

Three major Multiple Listing Services (MLSs) – California Regional MLS (CRMLS), Bright MLS, and Midwest Real Estate Data (MRED) – have reached a settlement in a longstanding lawsuit challenging the National Association of Realtors’ (NAR) Clear Cooperation policy.

The ongoing legal battle began in 2020, with ThePLS.com as the plaintiff. While the mega MLSs have opted for resolution, NAR remains a defendant in the lawsuit.

What is the Pocket Listing Lawsuit?

The lawsuit, initiated by ThePLS.com, revolves around NAR’s Clear Cooperation policy, implemented in 2019. This policy mandates MLS participants to share publicly marketed listings within 24 hours. 

ThePLS.com, which launched in 2017, is a platform focused on pocket listings – properties not necessarily intended for public MLS exposure. In 2020, the PLS contested NAR’s policy in court, claiming it to be anticompetitive.

Settlement Details

In a joint filing on January 24, 2024, the CRMLS, Bright MLS, and MRED, along with plaintiff ThePLS.com, informed the U.S. District Court that they reached a “settlement in principle.” The MLS defendants requested a stay of deadlines to finalize the agreement, which was granted by Judge John W. Holcomb the following day.  

While the major MLSs in the case have settled, NAR continues to face legal challenges in this case. Another pocket listing case against NAR, brought by Top Agent Network, also remains ongoing. In addition, NAR continues to face numerous copycat commission lawsuits in the wake of the Sitzer/Burnett verdict

Download the printable PDF with all 27 lines:

Sign Up for the BAM Newsletter

For daily real estate news, business and marketing.

About the Author

Meet Vanessa Bowman, senior editor at BAM. Combining her background in elementary education and journalism, Vanessa has been crafting content for the real estate industry since 2017. From BAM blogs to ebooks, courses, and everything in between, she brings a unique perspective to her work. But her favorite part? Collaborating with BAM's incredible creators and contributors to bring fresh and exciting ideas to life.

Share:

Related Posts

Recent Articles

Upcoming Events

Virtual Event
Virtual
Webinar
Virtual

Related Posts