The Federal Trade Commission fined Opendoor Labs Inc. $62 million this week, accusing the iBuyer giant of cheating sellers and being dishonest about its offers. 

What really happened behind the scenes? And what can real estate agents do to help their clients protect themselves, however they decide to sell their homes?

Opendoor’s empty promises

Opendoor’s biggest promise—the one that got sellers to sign up with dollar signs in their eyes—was that consumers would make more money by selling their homes to its iBuyer instead of the traditional sales on the open market. 

That promise rested on three others: 

  1. Opendoor would offer market value for consumer’s homes
  2. Consumers would pay lower costs than with traditional home sales
  3. Consumers would make more money than with traditional home sales

As the FTC complaint points out, Opendoor promised to use its “cutting edge technology” to save consumers money with market-value offers and reduced transaction costs. 

The reality was pretty much the opposite: offers were below market value—by design—and costs were significantly higher than what consumers paid through traditional sales. 

As a result, the vast majority of those who sold their homes to Opendoor lost thousands of dollars compared to what they would have gained in net proceeds from selling on the open market. 

Opendoor promised to revolutionize the real estate market but built its business using old-fashioned deception about how much consumers could earn from selling their homes on the platform. There is nothing innovative about cheating consumers.

Samuel Levine

Director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection

The reality of working with Opendoor

The FTC complaint went into exhaustive detail on the reality of working with Opendoor as a seller—exposing each of Opendoor’s promises and misleading claims.  

Evidence from the FTC complaint revealed the following: 

  • Opendoor consistently offered less than market value for seller’s homes
  • Opendoor’s costs were higher than what sellers paid in traditional sales
  • Opendoor demanded repairs that were not required with traditional sales
  • Opendoor overstated the cost of traditional sales (to make themselves look better)
  • Opendoor adjusted its offers to offset estimates for potential repairs—and kept the difference as revenue–without disclosing that to the seller. 

Automated value estimates and manual adjustments

Opendoor used an automated system to determine expected market values for homes. In many cases, Opendoor employees manually adjusted those values—reducing them by a predetermined percentage—before presenting them to sellers as “market value offers.” 

Starting no later than 2019, Opendoor instituted a company policy to reduce its manually-adjusted offers to a specific percentage below Opendoor’s assessed market value. 

In short, Opendoor higher-ups knew those offers did not represent market value, but presented them as if they were.


And as long as consumers didn’t look too closely or compare those offers with someone else’s, they got away with it. Until they didn’t. 

Buying low and selling high—and lying about it

Opendoor claimed that, “unlike a home flipper,”  its business model isn’t based on buying low and selling high. According to the company’s marketing copy, it makes money by charging a fee for its service. Sounds pretty transparent, right? 

A closer look at Opendoor’s offers reveals that selling homes for more than its (below market value) offer price is a significant part of its revenue. 

So, buying low and selling high is exactly what Opendoor was doing. 

Opendoor demanded extra repairs

The FTC complaint included Opendoor’s own internal study of sellers who withdrew after receiving Opendoor’s repair demands. Those studies showed that people who then sold their homes on the open market did so without having to make the repairs Opendoor demanded.

So, after advertising that consumers would save money by selling their homes to Opendoor, the company charged sellers for repairs that weren’t even necessary. 

And then the sellers (understandably) said, “I’m out,” and ended up selling their homes without said repairs—likely at a price closer to market value. 

Opendoor Costs vs. Traditional Sales

According to the FTC complaint, Opendoor overstated the cost of traditional sales to make it look as though it was saving consumers money. 

The company made a habit of misrepresenting the amounts sellers should expect to pay for some of the costs involved in traditional home sales with real estate agents—all to make Opendoor look like a less expensive and more consumer-friendly alternative. 


In fact, most sellers working with Opendoor ended up paying more than what consumers typically pay when working with a traditional realtor. 

Adjusting for Repair Costs

Around August 2018, Opendoor started adjusting its offers (i.e., reducing them) to offset anticipated repair costs. 

Except no one bothered mentioning this to sellers–or even hinting that the offers were below market value (which they were). If actual repairs were less than the amount withheld from the offer, Opendoor kept the difference as revenue. 

Even before Opendoor implemented this policy, it reduced certain offers to offset potential repairs, which meant sellers were getting sub-market offers. At the same time, Opendoor hid the assessed repair costs from them. 

Opendoor’s statement on the FTC settlement

Opendoor issued its own statement in response to the FTC complaint, disagreeing with the allegations but agreeing to the settlement so it can “resolve the matter and focus on helping consumers….” 

According to its statement, “allegations raised by the FTC are related to activity that occurred between 2017 and 2019 and target marketing messages the company modified years ago.” 

So… cheating customers way back in the 20-teens is so not an issue anymore, especially since Opendoor has updated its marketing copy since then. 

What does this mean for Opendoor’s future?

We can only speculate how the FTC’s public complaint against Opendoor will affect the company from here on out. Stock performance—how its numbers compare to others in the iBuyer space—will tell us something. 

But even if the complaint referred to activity between 2017 and 2019—and to marketing messages that have allegedly changed since then—how many sellers are likely to trust a company exposed for lying to its customers? 

What guarantee do they have that Opendoor won’t find another way to cheat them? 

Has Opendoor shown in any way that its interest in helping customers goes any deeper than its casual and invalidating dismissal of the FTC settlement? 

What does this mean for real estate agents?

As a real estate agent, you have an opportunity to meet with clients and prospects face to face and help them understand the landscape. That’s anything but antiquated. It’s the personal touch Opendoor cannot hope to replicate. 

Meeting people face-to-face humanizes them—makes them more than a number to factor into a company’s profit margins. 

Own that. Talk to people and give them the benefit of your specialized and constantly developing expertise on your market. 

What you do as a real estate agent will never be outmoded or obsolete. You are needed.